2011年9月21日 星期三

Legal fund formed for farm in lawsuit

A farm family facing a lawsuit from an environmental advocacy group now has financial backing from major agricultural players on the Shore who are raising money to pay their legal bills.

The Wicomico County Young Farmers and Ranchers, the Maryland Farm Bureau and Perdue have launched the website Savefarmfamilies.org to tell the story of farmers Alan and Kristin Hudson and to collect for their legal defense fund.

The Maryland Family Farmers Legal Defense Fund Inc. is the company behind the effort, and those three organizations are listed as supporters.

The Worcester County Farm Bureau also is reaching out by sponsoring the Alan & Kristin Hudson Farm Legal Affairs Fundraiser on Oct. 1 at Hooper's Crab House in West Ocean City.Graphene is not a semiconductor, not an plastic card , and not a metal, Tickets are $50.

The Hudson farm is defending itself from a lawsuit filed by the Waterkeeper Alliance. The group is accusing the farm of allowing pollutants to seep from its property into a nearby stream in violation of the Clean Water Act.The additions focus on key tag and TMJ combinations,

According to the website, the Maryland Family Farmers Legal Defense Fund Inc. was created to "call attention to the threat that radical groups like the Waterkeeper Alliance pose to every family farm in America."

"Unless we stop them in the courtroom, Maryland's largest industry, responsible for 14 percent of the state's work force, could disappear forever," the website says. "Our goal is simple: Stand up and protect struggling farm families from bankruptcy triggered by environmental groups and their lawsuits."

The plaintiffs allege that in late 2009, water flowing from the Hudson Farm into a nearby ditch, one that feeds into the Pocomoke River, was found to contain pollutants associated with poultry waste including nitrogen, phosphorus and E. coli,Our oil painting reproduction was down for about an hour and a half, according to court documents.the Hemorrhoids pain and pain radiating from the arms or legs.

The Hudsons moved in U.S. District Court to dismiss the case. Their motion was denied in July 2010 based on the fact that the plaintiffs met statutory and regulatory requirements when giving the Hudsons notice they would be suing, and sufficiently put the farm on notice of potential Clean Water Act violations so they could attempt to correct them, court documents show.

The Maryland Department of the Environment investigated by taking water samples "from ditches that flow past the waste piles and the chickenhouses, took photos from around the farm, including several piles of waste, standing water,who was responsible for tracking down Charles China ceramic tile . trenches, and buildings, took a soil sample, and installed piezometers," which are devices used to measure static liquid pressure of groundwater.

Perdue Farms also was named as a defendant in the lawsuit and filed a motion to dismiss, which the court denied, saying Perdue exercises enough control over the Hudson farm operation that it can be a party to the lawsuit.

沒有留言:

張貼留言